About this project
Project overview
Example workflow showing how Spatial Nexus approaches this type of analysis.
Access, slope, land use and constraints combined into a ranked suitability surface.
This page shows a typical Spatial Nexus workflow for this type of analysis.
- site suitability analysis
- multi-criteria decision analysis GIS
- site selection GIS
- weighted overlay
- public facility planning
Project at a glance
- Sector
- Spatial Analysis
- Software
- ArcGIS Pro, Network Analyst, QGIS, Python
THE CHALLENGE
What needed solving
- Choosing a facility site involves many competing criteria.
- Decisions must be transparent and defensible.
OBJECTIVES
What the project set out to do
- Agree criteria and weights with stakeholders.
- Produce a ranked suitability surface.
- Shortlist candidate sites.
Methodology
Our workflow, step by step
01
Criteria
Agree criteria, constraints and weights with the client.
02
Data preparation
Standardise each criterion to a common scale.
03
Overlay
Weighted overlay and constraint masking.
04
Ranking
Shortlist and compare candidate sites.
Results
What the analysis delivered
- Suitability map ranking locations.
- Shortlist of candidate sites.
- Documented criteria and weights.
Key highlights
Why this project stands out
- Criteria
- Data preparation
- Overlay
- Ranking
Data sources
Data used
- Road network and accessibility
- Slope from elevation data
- Land use and constraints
Tools and technologies
Software and methods
Deliverables
What the client received
- Suitability or ranking maps
- Criteria and weighting documentation
- Scenario comparisons
- Short decision report
FAQ
Questions about this project
What is multi-criteria analysis?
A method that combines several weighted factors, such as access and slope, into one suitability score.
Can weights be changed?
Yes. Scenarios can be rerun with different weights to test sensitivity.



